window.lintrk('track', { conversion_id: 7652236 });

Microservice architecture is an architectural approach in which an application is structured as a collection of highly maintained and tested services, loosely connected, independently deployable, structured around the business’s core competencies, and governed by a small group.

Previously, traditional apps such as the many software products on your PC covered a broad range of functions. In a typical scenario, the developer just had to add more code if more functionality was necessary. This is termed monolithic architecture.

Monolithic architecture is an architectural style that consists of only one application. What starts as a modest code base quickly grows into a massive, sophisticated, unmanageable code base.

To address this problem, the next evolution in software development divided functions into sections depending on business skills. These compact, self-contained, and reusable pieces were designed to accomplish a specific function. Instead of having a large codebase, the code is broken down into smaller modules, which are then assembled into the program.

Even though the functionality has been divided down, the programmer still puts these modules together to create a single application. This doesn’t solve the problem because we still have all of the traditional application’s deployment and runtime difficulties, such as downtime and the requirement to maintain and deploy a single, large program all at once.

Developers gradually shifted to web apps that run on a web server, with the output of the distant machine’s operation viewed in your web browser. What effect does this have? We now have a well-organized, structured, and modularized code base that has been assembled into a single monolithic application.

Although the code and deployment are identical, the end result is still a single monolithic application. Due to the addition of new, exciting features, web app development becomes increasingly sophisticated with time. Complexity has to be managed at the code management, implementation, and runtime or execution levels.

Over the last two to three decades, there has been a steady increase in interest in microservices and pioneers. The introduction of such brands has aided many enterprises in replacing their monolithic application design with a loosely linked but considerably more robust one. This has led to widespread use, with microservices widely recognized as solid architectural models.

 

Top Reasons for transitioning from Monolithic Applications to Microservices

 

Top Reasons for transitioning from Monolithic Applications to Microservices

 

Inflexibility 

A good example of the inflexibility of the older programming methods can be demonstrated in the scaling of online eCommerce platforms, which is difficult since traffic spikes are unpredictable. Traffic is usually very high during peak sales periods, and when the sale is over, traffic drops. Thankfully, we now have elastic servers, which can scale up the number of application servers when traffic spikes and then scale down when traffic drops.

Consider an eCommerce platform that is built as a single application. There is an increase in traffic to the shopping functions during a sale, adding to the cart, checking out, and paying. In the case of monolithic applications, all of these features must be scaled horizontally capturing the entire program unnecessarily, even though some functions are not used.

 

Large applications are challenging to deploy

When you make a tiny change, you must test the entire program with each modification before deploying it, making the process complicated for larger apps.

 

Lack of unity amongst developers

Collaboration among developers is complex. If one developer modifies the database schema, it may break others. This had been a significant setback to the space but one that has now been thrown under the bus, thanks to the expansive adoption of microservices. But before we transition to discuss whether many data processing cases are simpler and more lightweight architectures than microservices, it’s also prudent for you to understand some of the benefits they bring on board.

 

Benefits of Microservices

 

Benefits of Microservices 

 

  • Much easier to maintain

In some instances, most regular users might wonder why microservices weren’t discovered earlier. Others might ask how you should design a monolith when microservices are much easier to maintain.

Microservices can also create a close analogy of how the industry changes every day. With the world shifting to the social media space, the expectation is near-unlimited data use and instant connectivity. You also need to understand that not everything possible now was possible a few years ago. Most systems from that era were not built to take advantage of what is now possible, including microservices. You also have to understand that they were optimized for what was possible with a provision for more improvements in the comings years.

 

  • Customer Value 

The global record of IT initiatives is littered with well-intentioned failures, where the technical solution was prioritized over customer value.

In essence, what matters to the consumer are the technological outcomes. It makes a lot of sense to consider this while evaluating new technology. Is it true that implementing new technology and the new features helps boost customer value? When evaluating improvement opportunities that, in most circumstances, do come at a cost, this is a critical litmus test.

It’s also crucial to make sure you understand the “why” behind the technology and the attitude required to succeed with it. Following trends blindly leads to cargo-cult programming, or computer programming which reuses standard code or program structures that serve no real purpose.

 

  • Reliability 

One of the top attributes of microservices is their independence which enhances the application’s resistance to failure. This is unlike monolithic architecture, where the failure of a single component can result in the failure of the entire system.

In a microservice architecture, every service performs just one function. As a result of the minimalist codebase, it is easy to develop, scale, and test each service individually.

 

  • Risk management 

Because the microservices framework treats each service as a unique object, it allows them to act independently. As a result, even if one component fails, the entire application runs without affecting the entire process. Only one component must be repaired or rebuilt in this scenario.

As a result, the danger of business applications collapsing is reduced. This helps businesses manage the various operational risks that might affect their operations. You are also guaranteed smooth business operations with minimal disruptions or downtimes.

 

Whats beyond Microservices in Data Processing

 

What’s beyond Microservices in Data Processing? 

With organizations becoming more eager to perform application development utilizing microservices architecture, these services have become a prominent topic in software design. However, there is also a growing concern about what’s beyond this widely adopted microservice in the data processing.

It’s even becoming a major concern when you factor in that it’s not easy to switch to a microservices design. To be effective requires many criteria, and if you have several services, it’s easy to lose track of how much resources they consume. Even when idle, the tiniest service has a run-time footprint and consumes CPU cycles. The impact is more visible when you multiply this by the number of services you have.

Developers and organizations are starting to consider possible fronts, which include going serverless. Suppose you remove all of your controller, hosting, verification, logging, and monitoring middleware, as well as dependency injection and pipeline constructs. In that case, only the core competency itself should exist, provided you’ve written your code properly.

Every microservices application has a copy of all other code authenticating, validating, logging, monitoring, and resolving. Put all of this standard functionality into a hosting microservice that can recognize your request handling function and execute it when a request comes in. You can quickly see that you have a pseudo-ecosystem for rolling business operations after figuring out the automated implementation and expanding for that single service.

The ecosystem can then be removed and used for your microservices. Developers will then design and deploy business functionalities within the network.

You don’t need to set up machines, set up hosting configurations, or do any of the other “plumbing” that a typical independent service requires. The terms “serverless” and “function as a service (faas)” are used here.

At first glance, it looks like you no longer require servers. The ecosystem that can execute your business tasks becomes the only necessity. However, this will not negate the requirement for a dedicated server behind the scenes. It implies you won’t have to bother about server administration.

Alternatively, you can create convenience methods to get and put data to a store, distribute cache, and initiate the possibility of integrating, such as using message queues. You can also add a scheduling system and other general functionality as an alternative to constructing a functional host. Normally, they’d be included in your microservice.

In a monolithic environment, it’s simply a matter of wrapping them up elegantly and making that functionality available to your handler functions. This can be done through context, injection, or any other means. Your ecosystem can tackle more challenges consistently, especially if it contains more generic services.

Generic functions can also make your functions easier to understand and monitor because they are already incorporated.

Benefits of Going Serverless

Benefits of Going Serverless 

 

Adaptability 

When scaling, serverless gets incredibly efficient. The data is distributed evenly across all function hosts since the function host is always the same, and any host can perform any function. If you notice a drop in functionality, you can start a new function host. This directly translates to the expense of your architecture in this cloud network era. You can save money on infrastructure by maximizing the use of your extra resources.

 

Enhanced efficiency  

The time it takes for a procedure to perform vs. the resources utilized by a microservice would be used to evaluate resource utilization. As a result, your architecture will have substantially less “downtime,” as multiple functions can execute on the same server.

 

Easy to deploy

It could be as simple as binding to a handler function repository if a function transfer to a host is done correctly. Also, deployment troubles may be completely eliminated. Furthermore, because handler functions are content in an ecosystem, it may even remove your Dev, QA, and Prod environments. Moving the handler to production is similar to publishing a page in a content management system. You may quickly spin up new required features thanks to the same ease.

 

Conclusion

In summary, an industry focused on the Internet of Things (IoT) is an excellent example where serverless would suit. For comparatively simple functions, IoT necessitates a huge level of functionality, such as device updates. Furthermore, the number of devices could vary anywhere from very few to thousands.

Software for a device is just another aspect of the product for a manufacturer. They do, however, require the capacity to swiftly design and deploy the function, as well as the ability to scale efficiently. For some manufacturers, a typical strategy may be excessively slow and inconvenient. As a result, having a design that facilitates distribution would be a significant competitive advantage.

For more information and resources about microservices and data processing, you can follow us on our Facebook, Instagram and Twitter platforms. You can also contact us, and our team will be on hand to answer any questions.